|
THE WEEK IN
REVIEW
All three Dow Jones
Indices posted risk premium declines. In addition, the Dow Industrials
performance was not displeasing.
It climbed 783 points, closing out the abbreviated holiday
trading week at 8,829.04, 9.7% higher.
§ The
Industrial Risk Premium for the week ended November 28th fell
to 9.39% versus 10.30% in the prior week
§ Over
the same period
the Transportation Risk
Premium declined to 8.56% from 9.45%
§ Finally,
the Utility Risk Premium number eased to 8.58% from 8.96%
The risk premium improvements were heavily
influenced by stocks reacting favorably to the U.S. government’s
assurance to craft a financial assistance plan for Citigroup.
This development may have served as a relief
valve, releasing the mounting pressure, at least temporarily, on the
financial services sector. It was largely concern
over the heath of financial intermediaries, notably
Citigroup, having an adverse effect on the Dow Industrials to 7,552 the,
its lowest close since March 11, 2003 when the index hit
7,524.
ARE STOCKS
FINALLY CHEAP? NOT BASED ON A 20-30 YEAR TRIPLE TOP
Based on the input variables driving our Risk
Premium Model, stocks may be “becoming cheap” based on a series of
evaluation measures extending as back as 50 years.
In effect, by expanding the
statistical time line, the bull market experienced early in this decade
may have been the middle of triple-top of a bull market started much
earlier, perhaps back to the 1980s.
We have long held to the view that equities throughout this slump
have not necessarily been bargains particular when valuing them from the
“top” down (August 2007). Our model has convinced us more than ever than
we approaching the end of a much longer market cycle, rendering
downturns in the intervening period mere blips along a cycle which may
be 30 years or older.
But now we believe that valuations based on
variables such as Dividend Yield, Book
Value and Return-on-Capital
are closing in on appropriate fair-market prices and that stocks are
beginning to form bottoms which can offer long-term value. This is not
to be confused with an expectation that stocks are expected to suddenly
make a convincing bullish advance. (The lead-up dot-com and real estate
bubbles were merely bubbles within an extended bull market which wiser
observers knew could not be sustained. It is now our considered opinion
that when the post mortem on this market cycle is completed, some
investors may very well conclude that the U.S. economy was really
experiencing a “W-shaped” bear market despite market upswings such as
the 14,164 finish on October 9, 2007.)
THE CITIGROUP
RESCUE
Given Citigroup’s large global presence and its
market prominence, securing an aid program for the corporate behemoth
was vital to the stability of both stock and bond markets.
Highlights of Citi’s accord with the U.S. Treasury, the Federal
Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation which have
structured a $40-billion capital benefit program:
Liquidity
&
Infusions of Capital
§
Citi
will issue preferred stock and warrants to the U.S. Treasury
having a $20-billion face value and issued as part of the
Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)
§
Citi
will issue an incremental $7 billion in preferred stock to the
U.S. Treasury and the FDIC as payment for a government guarantee
on $306 billion of securities, loans and commitments backed by
residential and commercial real estate and other assets
§
As a
result of the asset guarantee, the $306-billion portfolio will
have a new risk weighting of 20%, thus freeing up an additional
$16 billion of capital to the company
§
Citi
will issue warrants to the U.S. Treasury and the FDIC for
approximately 254 million shares of the company's common stock
at a strike price of $10.61
§
Citi
also has agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend
exceeding $0.01 (one cent) per share for three years, effective
on the next quarterly common stock dividend payout
§
$20
billion from the TARP investment
§
$3.5
billion, the portion of the $7 billion of preferred stock fee
recognized for capital purposes
|
|
|
THE DETROIT BIG
WHEELS
Meanwhile, investors (and, of course, employees and
suppliers) in the three major U.S. auto manufacturers will be waiting to
see what Congress will do for them.
In the kindest terms I can think of, Congress instructed the
automakers to come back when they had made substantial progress on
self-help plans. Their chief executives were chastised for using
corporate jets to attend Congressional hearings and were encouraged to
fly commercial. It should be
interesting to see what austerity plans they lay out. Many observers
believe the chagrined Detroit grandees will enjoy a more sympathetic
hearing the second time around.
TRAFFIC ON THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD IS
GROWING
Not surprisingly, shortly after the auto industry
made its pitch to Congress, homebuilders traveled down the yellow brick
road to Congress. However, they did not find a wizard but a dead end.
Although the plight of the homebuilders is serious, the U.S.
government cannot afford (literally) to underwrite the financial bailout
of all sectors of the economy. There needs to be a brake on the
government acting as the lender of last resort for all corporate
America. Congress needs to
be judicious in the industries it can and is willing to help.
While the federal government is not normally in the lending
business, its current substantial involvement in the financial sector is
arguably its primary tool for preventing substantial economic
dislocations. But if there
is a “moral hazard” (...I
hate this phrase), it
presents a risk that continuing handouts to corporate supplicants
will undermine our capitalist economic system, causing a drift into
socialism without us even realizing what or how it happened.
|
Date |
November 21, 2008 |
Date |
November 28, 2008 |
| Total DJ
Industrial Risk Premium |
10.30% |
Total DJ Industrial Risk Premium |
9.39% |
| 30 Year
Treasury |
3.70% |
30 Year Treasury |
3.45% |
|
Industrial Risk Differential |
6.60% |
Industrial Risk Differential |
5.94% |
| |
|
|
|
| Date |
November 21, 2008 |
Date |
November 28, 2008 |
| Total DJ
Transportations Risk Premium |
9.45% |
Total DJ Transportations Risk Premium |
8.56% |
| 30 Year
Treasury |
3.70% |
30 Year Treasury |
3.45% |
|
Transportation Risk Differential |
2.05% |
Transportation Risk Differential |
1.66% |
| |
|
|
|
| Date |
November 21, 2008 |
Date |
November 28, 2008 |
| Total DJ
Utility Risk Premium |
8.96% |
Total DJ Utility Risk Premium |
8.58% |
| 30 Year
Treasury |
3.70% |
30 Year Treasury |
3.45% |
| Utility
Risk Differential |
5.26% |
Utility Risk Differential |
5.13% |
| © 2009 Whitehall Financial Advisors LLC |
Continues ▼

Continues ▼

Continues ▼

For Additional Information or Questions Please
Contact
Us. |